Fund Spotlight: Vanguard Consumer Staples (VDC)

Consumer staples companies have enjoyed a strong month. Vanguard Consumer Staples (VDC) climbed 5.69 percent, beating the S&P 500 Index. In the wake of bank failures, investors have shifted capital in one of two main ways. The first was bidding up BigTech companies that dominate the S&P 500 Index. The other was buying stocks that are sometimes dubbed defensive stocks, such as utilities and consumer staples.

Many actively managed funds must remain fully invested. Their managers cannot reduce their equity exposure, but they can shift their sector and stock exposure. When they see a risk-off environment, they prefer holding stocks with lower downside: those with lower valuations, steadier earnings, higher dividends, stronger balance sheets and so on. Many buy-and-hold investors also hold these types of stocks for income, and keep on holding through recessions and bear markets. As a result, these stocks usually hold up better than the more speculative stocks that dominate selling waves in corrections and bear markets.

Behavior of consumer staples stocks versus the broader market, along with slowing economic growth, indicate investors may continue their defensive ways moving forward. Consumer staples bottomed relative to the broader stock market in the middle of 2007. They peaked, relative to the market, near the stock market low in March 2009. Consumer staples would make another relative-high in early 2016, just as the world’s central banks began a global coordinated easing effort. Consumer staples made a relative-low in late 2021 near the time the Nasdaq was peaking. Since then, the relative performance of staples has been similar to the relative performance in 2007 and early 2008. Only hindsight will prove beyond a doubt whether this is a sustainable move, but if it continues, it indicates a choppy sideways market such as we saw from 2014 to 2016.

VDC tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, which includes large-, mid- and small-cap consumer staples companies. It has $7.8 billion in assets spread across 101 holdings. There is an Admiral Class of the fund that trades under the symbol VCSAX.

VDC was launched in January 2004. It is no longer the cheapest consumer staples ETF, but it remains among the lowest cost with an expense ratio of 0.10 percent.

It yields 2.30 percent, well ahead of the 1.53 percent yield of SPDR S&P 500 (SPY).

VDC has a 4-star and Gold rating from Morningstar.


VDC has an average market capitalization of $78.48 billion. This beats the sector average of $63.69 billion, but comes in shy of the market capitalization weighted index average of $82.37 billion. VDC has seen its largest stocks grow faster than average over the past year as small-caps underperformed. Giant-caps now make up 45 percent of assets, with most of that increase coming from the large-cap exposure that has dipped to 29 percent. Mid-, small- and micro-caps have 17 percent, 6 percent and 3 percent of assets, respectively.

As of the February 28 snapshot, Procter & Gamble (PG) was the top holding with 12.22 percent of assets. Coca-Cola (KO) has 8.87 percent, Pepsi (PEP) 8.67 percent, Costco (COST) 7.69 percent, Walmart (WMT) 7.57 percent, Philip Morris International (PM) 4.41 percent, Mondelez (MDLZ) 3.74 percent, Altria (MO) 3.51 percent, Colgate-Palmolive (CL) 2.48 percent and Estée Lauder (EL) 2.37 percent.

VDC is different from some of the most popular consumer staples ETFs such as SPDR Consumer Staples (XLP) because it has more diversified exposure. Procter & Gamble makes up more than 14 percent of XLP’s assets. It also has more retail exposure. Soft drinks have 21.10 percent of VDC’s assets, followed by household products with 19.20 percent, packaged foods 17.40 percent, hypermarkets 16 percent and tobacco 8.30 percent.

VDC has a beta of 0.63, less than the category’s 0.67, but slightly higher than the index’s 0.65 beta. The standard deviation is 14.94, below that of the category’s 15.75 and the index’s 15.19 standard deviation. VDC is less volatile than the average fund in the category, but all consumer staples funds and indexes are less volatile than and less correlated with the market.


VDC has increased 2.23 percent in 2021. Over the past 1-, 3-, 5-, 10- and 15-year periods it gained an annualized negative 1.20 percent, 13.16 percent, 10.26 percent, 9.55 percent and 9.80 percent, respectively. Except for the past 3-year period, VDC has otherwise outperformed the category in all periods.

Performance has been helped by stocks such as Pepsi and Coca-Cola. The former made an all-time high in late 2022, while the latter is barely off its record high. Walmart was rocked in 2022, but has recovered the bulk of its losses, sitting less than $10 away from its previous high. Mondelez has powered on to new all-time highs, the latest being set in early April.


VDC offers a diversified exposure in the consumer staples sector. These companies and this sector are the tortoises in the hare versus tortoise race of the investing world. Consumer staples earn nearly all of their relative outperformance versus the S&P 500 Index during bear markets. That isn’t to say they don’t perform well over time, as the returns data attests. During bear markets, these stocks hold up far better and that drives their long-term performance relative to the broader stock market.

For conservative investors and those drawing down principal in retirement, the lower volatility of consumers staples stocks, particularly during corrections, makes them a good sector overweight. Investors may also reassess their overall equity exposure in light of the cautionary signal being thrown off by staples’ outperformance. As long as the economy stays on track, money will flow into the markets and investors will continue bidding up consumer staples shares even if the overall market remains choppy.


Interested in continuing to receive strategic guidance on Vanguard Funds? Subscribe to the Investor Guide to Vanguard Funds today to gain immediate access to our full archives, including our most recent issue.

Fund Spotlight: Vanguard Extended Duration (EDV)

In 2022, long-term U.S. Treasury bonds suffered their worst performance since the early days of the American republic. Rising inflation, along with Federal Reserve rate increases, sent bond prices tumbling. This wasn’t the start of the move though. Bonds peaked during the March 2020 lockdowns and had been falling steadily since then. It’s likely that last year’s low will hold for some time. As long as inflation is brought under control, interest rates on corporate bonds already compensate investors well for inflation risk. If inflation falls further, government bonds are also compelling options for fixed income investors.

The most volatile part of the government bond market is long-term Treasury bonds. In the U.S., that is the 30-year bond. These bonds fluctuate greatly when interest rates make large moves up or down because they are valued on 30 years’ worth of cash flows along with the return of principal. The most volatile security is the zero-coupon bond because all the cash flow comes 30 years from now. Any change in the interest rate is compounded for 30 years.

EDV is a zero-coupon bond fund that owns Treasury STRIPS with maturities of 20 to 30 years. This gives it one of the longest durations in the market at 24.23 years.

Duration is a measure of interest rate risk. Most investors are familiar with the concept of a bond’s maturity. That’s how many years it has until it matures and the principal is repaid. Bonds with high coupons, such as high-yield bonds, have durations lower than their maturity. In the case of zero-coupon bonds, they have durations that match their maturity.

A rule of thumb says that a bond or bond fund’s price will move about 1 percent multiplied by the duration, for a 1 percent move in the interest rate. Last year, both the 20-year and 30-year Treasury bond climbed about 2 percentage points. This would make for a possible 48 percent move in the price of EDV. In fact, the fund fell 39.16 percent, a bit better than expected.

Since the end of 2022, the 30-year Treasury yield has fallen about 0.3 percentage points. Multiply change in yield by EDV’s duration of 24.23 years and we get a number close to the 8.50 percent gain in EDV in 2023.

Reward-Free Risk

During periods of quantitative easing, the Federal Reserve cut interest rates to zero and held them there. At that time, some financial analysts and commentators referred to long-term Treasury bonds as “return-free risk,” a play on the term “risk-free rate” which refers to the 3-month Treasury bill rate. They called long-term bonds “return-free risk” because at the depth of the 2020 panic, 30-year Treasury bonds yielded less than 1 percent. Assuming interest rates would not go negative, there was almost zero upside in owning 30-year bonds even before considering future inflation. Their warning was prescient because between EDV’s all-time high in March 2020 and the low in October 2022, it would lose 55 percent of its value.

Today, the picture has changed. The Federal Reserve is still raising interest rates, but we’ve started seeing strain in the financial system. The failure of SVB Financial destroyed tens and perhaps hundreds of billions in capital, along with the tens of billions in stock market capitalization. This is deflationary and will help depress the rate of inflation moving forward. If more banks come under stress, the Federal Reserve will not continue its rate hiking policies. In short, we’re very close to the peak interest rate for this cycle.

Bonds Versus Stocks

During the era of quantitative easing, many bonds offered little in the way of income. Since the return on bonds was depressed, investors switched into high-yield debt for income or stocks in pursuit of capital gains. For much of this period, stocks were “cheap” relative to bonds because the latter offered so little in the way of return. In 2022, that started changing. In 2023, the yield on investment grade corporate bonds exceeded that of the S&P 500’s earnings yield (the inverse of the price-to-earnings ratio).

Comparing the S&P 500 earnings yield with investment grade corporate bond yield is a simple way to determine if stocks are over- or undervalued versus bonds. At current rates and stock valuations, investment grade corporate bonds are cheaper. However, this ignores that stocks are riskier on the whole. Stocks should trade at a discount to bonds because stock prices fluctuate more than bond prices. An investor who buys a bond and holds it to maturity is guaranteed the nominal return.

When investment grade corporate bonds offer a better yield than that of the S&P 500 Index, stocks are quite overvalued according to this measure. To wit, the last time corporate bonds had a higher yield than the S&P 500 earnings yield was in the late 1990s and 2007, both periods of stock overvaluation. However, in both cases this result was caused by extreme overvaluation of stocks and, naturally, bear markets ensued.

Given what we’ve seen in financial markets over the past month with increasing stress in the banking sector, it appears that long-term interest rates have peaked for this cycle. If long-term interest rates have peaked, long-term government bonds offer a compelling opportunity.

The likelihood of large losses in bonds is lower than it was at any time in the prior three years. In some scenarios where bonds lose big, stocks could lose more, meaning investors with growth and tech exposure are already taking on this risk. There are also scenarios where bonds win and stocks lose. All in all, there is a compelling argument for holding a fund such as EDV in place of some equity exposure, particularly in place of aggressive growth or technology stocks.

Vanguard Extended Duration

EDV tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury STRIPS 20-30 Year Equal Par Bond Index. It currently holds 80 bonds. The average duration is 24.2 years, and the average maturity is 24.7 years. The expense ratio is 0.06 percent. The 30-day SEC yield is 3.99 percent.

EDV has 1-, 3-, 5-, 10- and 15-year annualized returns of negative 29.36 percent, negative 18.74 percent, negative 1.46 percent, positive 1.55 percent and positive 4.58 percent, respectively.

EDV has a standard deviation of 19.32. For comparison, the S&P 500 Index has a standard deviation of 20.74, making EDV almost as volatile as the stock market.


Bonds are finally offering investors a compelling value proposition following last year’s sell-off. For the first time in years, investors can take on less credit risk and obtain meaningful income from investment grade corporate bonds and U.S. Treasuries. Longer-duration funds such as EDV also offer a better risk-reward proposition compared with growth stocks such as the Nasdaq or technology indexes.

This is even more pertinent if investors worry about recession risk and further downside in stocks, or if they believe long-term interest rates have peaked. A fund such as EDV can replace some of the tech or growth exposure in a portfolio, offering investors potential upside in scenarios where interest rates tumble in response to a recession or bear market in stocks.

EDV is not as compelling a holding within a portfolio’s bond sleeve because it is highly volatile and does have downside volatility risk. The income from EDV is not worth the risk when there are far less risky bond funds offering similar and, in many cases, higher yields. Investors would increase their overall portfolio volatility and risk if they swapped lower-risk, shorter-term bonds for a fund such as EDV. Compared with a fund such as Vanguard Information Technology (VGT) however, EDV doesn’t add that much risk and offers a different matrix of performance outcomes than do stocks.

In conclusion, for investors worried about recession and falling equity prices, and who believe long-term interest rates may have peaked, long-term bonds offer diversification. Long-term government bonds can rally if inflation falls, and they can rally if there is a bear market or recession that depresses interest rates. They might lag stocks in some of the “Goldilocks” scenarios, but when considering both the potential upside and downside of the technology and growth sectors of the market, a small allocation to EDV within a portfolio’s equity allocation can provide a measure of diversification without the kind of downside risk that such a position would have had for much of the previous decade.

Interested in continuing to receive strategic guidance on Vanguard Funds? Subscribe to the Investor Guide to Vanguard Funds today to gain immediate access to our full archives, including our most recent issue.